QuestionQ1
Network Security Support EngineerRefer to the exhibit, which displays the modified routing-kernel output.

Which statement is correct?
- A The BGP route to 10.0.4.0/24 is not in the forwarding information base.
- B The default static route through port2 is in the forwarding information base.
- C The default static route through 10.200.1.254 is not in the forwarding information base.
- D The egress interface associated with static route 8.8.8.8/32 is administratively up.
QuestionQ2
Network Security Support EngineerRefer to the exhibit showing the output of diagnose sys session stat.

Which statement regarding the output displayed in the exhibit is correct?
- A All the sessions in the session table are TCP sessions.
- B 162 sessions have been deleted because of memory page exhaustion.
- C There are 166 TCP sessions waiting to complete the three-way handshake.
- D There are two sessions that have not been removed in case of any out-of- order packets that arrive.
Community Discussion
QuestionQ3
Network Security Support EngineerRefer to the exhibit showing the output of get router info bgp neighbors 100.64.2.254 advertised-routes.

What conclusion can be drawn from the output?
- A The BGP neighbor is advertising the 10.20.30.40/24 network to the local router.
- B The router ID of the neighbor is 100.64.2.254.
- C The BGP state of the two BGP participants is OpenConfirm.
- D The local router is advertising the 10.20.30.40/24 network to its BGP neighbor.
Community Discussion
QuestionQ4
Network Security Support EngineerRefer to the exhibit, which displays the output of get router info bgp summary.

Which two statements are correct?
- A The local FortiGate has received one prefix from BGP neighbor 100.64.1.254.
- B The TCP connection with BGP neighbor 100.64.2.254 was successful.
- C The local FortiGate has received 18 packets from a BGP neighbor.
- D The local FortiGate is still calculating the prefixes received from the BGP neighbor 100.64.2.254.
Community Discussion
QuestionQ5
Network Security Support EngineerRefer to the exhibit showing output from a BGP debug command.

What can be concluded about the router in this scenario?
- A The router 100.64.3.1 needs to update the local AS number in its BGP configuration in order to bring up the BGP session with the local router.
- B An inbound route-map on local router is blocking the prefixes from neighbor 100.64.3.1.
- C All of the neighbors displayed are part of a single BGP configuration on the local router with the neighbor-range set to a value of 4.
- D The BGP session with peer 10.127.0.75 is up.












Community Discussion