About the Exam

The ISTQB Certified Tester AI Testing (CT-AI) v2.0 certification focuses on testing AI-based systems, including machine learning systems and generative AI systems such as large language models. It is aimed at testers, test managers, test consultants, data professionals, developers involved in AI-based systems, and others who need a structured understanding of AI testing. Passing demonstrates knowledge of AI-specific quality characteristics, machine learning testing concepts, and how to design and execute tests for AI-based systems.

Exam Topics

  • Introduction to AI7%
  • Quality Characteristics for AI-Based Systems7%
  • Machine Learning (ML) – Overview10%
  • ML – Data15%
  • ML Functional Performance Metrics8%
  • ML – Neural Networks and Testing4%
  • Testing AI-Based Systems Overview8%
  • Testing AI-Specific Quality Characteristics10%
  • Methods and Techniques for the Testing of AI-Based Systems16%
  • Test Environments for AI-Based Systems2%
  • Using AI for Testing13%

How to Use This Practice Exam

  1. Browse — Read each question, select your answer, and reveal the explanation.
  2. Exam Mode — Simulate real exam conditions with a timed session and score report.
  3. Learn Mode — Spaced repetition schedules questions you struggle with for long-term retention.

Download the Full Exam PDF

Get every question and answer in a clean, printable PDF built for offline study. Purchase once, keep permanent access, and re-download the latest version anytime.

Last updated March 17, 2026 at 4:09 PM

Topic filter
Retired questions
Question sort
Questions per page

QuestionQ1

Machine Learning (ML) – Overview

You are assessing the use of a highly accurate pre-trained model that is widely used in industry for a similar use case. There is an intention to use transfer-learning techniques to further tailor the model.

Which ONE of the following is the LEAST likely to be a significant risk of this approach?

Explanation

Pre-trained models and transfer learning can introduce or preserve bias-management, reproducibility, data-quality, and security concerns, while inconsistent data preparation between source-model training and subsequent use can reduce functional performance. Given that the selected source model is already highly accurate, widely adopted, and intended for a similar use case, unexpectedly low performance of the pre-trained model is the least likely significant risk among the stated alternatives.

Learn more

Community Discussion

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

QuestionQ2

ML – Data

Which ONE of the following scenarios would allow an ML model to be MOST effective at determining the criticality of newly identified defects?

  • A. A new application which is in the early stages of its first test cycle
  • B. An old application with lots of defect records but a brand new development and test team
  • C. An old application where defect records are linked to failed tests and production incidents
  • D. An old application with few critical defect records and many non-critical defect records
Explanation

Machine learning models require large volumes of relevant, well-labeled historical data to learn accurate predictive patterns. An old application whose defect records are explicitly linked to failed tests and production incidents provides exactly this: a rich dataset where each defect's real-world impact (i.e., its true criticality, as evidenced by test failures and production incidents) is known. This direct traceability between defect characteristics and actual consequences gives the ML model clear, reliable labels to learn from, enabling it to accurately classify the criticality of newly reported defects. In contrast, a new application lacks sufficient historical data, a new team (despite existing defect data) does not affect the model's data-driven learning process as directly as label quality does, and a dataset skewed heavily toward non-critical defects suffers from class imbalance, which degrades the model's ability to correctly identify critical defects.

Learn more

Community Discussion

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

QuestionQ3

ML – Data

An ML engineer using supervised learning must label images of football games according to the football’s location in each image. Which ONE of the following labeling approaches can be used?

Explanation

Annotation assigns labels to image content, including the position of an object such as a football through bounding boxes, keypoints, or segmentation masks.

Community Discussion

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

QuestionQ4

ML – Data

Data used for an object-detection ML system was found to have been incorrectly labeled in many instances.

Which ONE of the following options is MOST likely to result from this problem?

Explanation

Incorrect labels introduce erroneous ground truth into the training data, causing an object-detection model to learn incorrect classifications or bounding-box associations and thereby reducing prediction accuracy.

Community Discussion

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

QuestionQ5

ML – Data

Which ONE of the following is NOT likely to cause a data-quality issue affecting a single ML model?

Explanation

Data quality concerns the integrity of model input data, including issues such as missing, incorrectly typed, or out-of-range values. Hardware, sensor, and security failures can compromise those inputs. Incorrect weights are model parameters that affect how a model processes inputs and generates outputs, so they are a model-performance issue rather than an input-data-quality issue.

Learn more

Community Discussion

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!
Know a question that should be here? Contribute to this exam
Back home