Loading provider exams...
Loading provider exams...
A BIG-IP Administrator must load balance a pool of web servers. The load-balancing decision must consider the number of active connections on each pool member.
Which load-balancing method satisfies this requirement?
That's the end of the preview
100% of the questions are free for all users.
No strings attached.
Which persistence method would be best for F5 to load balance traffic from clients that use a single source IP (NAT) across multiple pool members with even distribution for an HTTPS web application?
How does the BIG-IP system distribute traffic according to the configuration below?
pool my_pool \{
Ib_mode fastest -
min active members 2
member 10.12.10.7:80 priority 3
member 10.12.10.8:80 priority 3
member 10.12.10.9:80 priority 3
member 10.12.10.4:80 priority 2
member 10.12.10.5:80 priority 2
member 10.12.10.6:80 priority 2
member 10.12.10.1:80 priority 1
member 10.12.10.2:80 priority 1
member 10.12.10.3:80 priority 1
\}
All pool members are online, and every other virtual-server setting remains at its default value.
What could change the load-balancing behavior?
Refer to the exhibits above.


DNS queries from two internal DNS servers are load-balanced to external DNS servers through a Virtual Server on a BIG-IP device. The DNS queries originate from 192.168.101.100 and 192.168.101.200 and are directed to 192.168.21.50.
All DNS queries intended for the external DNS servers fail. Which Virtual Server property should the BIG-IP Administrator change to fix this issue?
A BIG-IP Administrator uses backend servers that host multiple services on each server. Multiple virtual servers and pools are configured that reference the same backend servers.
Which load-balancing algorithm is most suitable for maintaining an equal number of connections on every backend server?
A Virtual Server uses an iRule to direct traffic to pool members based on the URI. The BIG-IP Administrator must change the pool member in the iRule.
Which event declaration must the BIG-IP Administrator modify to accomplish this?
A web-server administrator tells the BIG-IP Administrator that the web servers are overloaded. Beginning next month, the BIG-IP device will terminate SSL to lower the web-server load. The BIG-IP device already uses a client SSL profile and HTTP-level iRules.
What actions should the BIG-IP Administrator take to implement the required configuration?
Refer to the exhibit:

The BIG-IP Administrator configured an HTTP health monitor and applied it to a pool of HTTP web servers hosting the website www.f5.com, but every pool member reports a DOWN status. The monitor log on the LTM shows that the web server returns 400 Bad Request.
What is the correct monitor Send string?
A BIG-IP Administrator is investigating whether improved TCP performance is possible for a virtual server.
Which built-in profile should be tried first?
Which Virtual Server type does not allow the use of a default pool?
A BIG-IP Administrator observes the following log entry after users report problems connecting to a virtual server:
01010201:2: Inet port exhaustion on 10.70.110.112
to 192.28.123.250:80 (proto 6)
How should the BIG-IP Administrator change the SNAT pool associated with the virtual server?
Community Discussion