QuestionQ75

Prompt Engineering & Structured Output

You are expanding a multi-agent research system beyond its original single web search agent by adding specialized data sources:

  • A financial API agent that returns structured JSON containing revenue, margins, and growth rates
  • A news monitoring agent that returns prose summaries of recent developments
  • A patent analysis agent that returns structured lists of technology areas

The synthesis agent combines the outputs from these subagents into executive briefings. Currently, the synthesis agent converts everything into bullet points, which causes:

  • Financial comparisons to lose their tabular clarity
  • News summaries to lose their narrative flow

What change would most improve the quality of the briefings?

Explanation

The problem described is that a single uniform output format (bullet points) is being applied to fundamentally different content types, destroying the structural characteristics that make each type useful — tables convey quantitative comparisons (revenue, margins, growth rates) far better than bullets, while prose preserves the narrative flow of news developments. The correct fix is to make the synthesis agent format-aware: render each content type in the representation best suited to it (tables for structured financial/patent data, prose for narrative news) rather than flattening everything into one generic format. Standardizing all subagents to a single output format (prose or JSON) merely shifts the mismatch problem instead of solving it, since it would force either financial data into narrative form (losing precision/comparability) or news into rigid structured fields (losing narrative flow). Inserting an intermediate common representation layer doesn't solve the underlying issue either, since the synthesis step still needs logic to decide how to display each content type appropriately — the fix belongs in the synthesis/rendering logic itself, adapting output format to content type.

Community Discussion

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!