CCA-F: Claude Certified Architect — Foundations

Production reviews show that uncertainty is handled inconsistently in final reports. At times, conflicting subagent findings are combined into one confident statement, losing nuance; at other times, reports use so many qualifications that they become unhelpful. When the web-search agent reports “industry analysts estimate $50B market size (methodology varies)” and the document-analysis agent reports “peer-reviewed study estimates $35B (±$7B, 95% CI),” the coordinator either arbitrarily selects one or produces vague wording such as “the market may be $35B-$50B depending on factors.” What systematic approach best resolves this?